2003-10-09 15:01:39 UTC
Why Should a Man Bear Responsibility for a Woman who Decides to
have a Baby?
Are women responsible for anything that they do?
The UK has the highest rate of teenage pregnancies in Europe.
90,000 women under the age of 19 give birth every year.
However, isn't it incredible that when it comes to having a baby,
the feminist propaganda machine always tries to make us believe
that the man is responsible for such an event, when, in fact, he
has very little to do with it?
How many times do we hear the politically-correct complaining
about the boys who go around impregnating girls and then
abandoning them, as if, somehow, the boys have any control over
what the girls' biological outcomes will be?
It is females who are in control of their pregnancies. And they
have total control.
Females have ready access to all forms of contraception. They can
take the contraceptive pill. They can take the morning-after
pill. They can don the diaphragm. They can insist on condoms.
They can use spermicide. They can have abortions. And they can
keep their legs closed.
To prevent an unwanted baby being born, they can do something
before sex, during sex and after sex.
They are in charge in all areas to do with giving birth -
physically, chemically, biologically, psychologically, socially,
legally and medically.
In the UK today, no man can force a woman to have a baby. It is
entirely her choice. So why do our politicians and the media
continue to blame men (and with such vitriol) for unwanted or
undesirable pregnancies? The answer is, of course, very simple.
It is the vindictive, prejudicial rhetoric of feminism which
always blocks any attempts to make women responsible for
Unfortunately, promoting this politically-correct nonsense takes
away responsibility from the very group of people - women - who
have the wherewithal to prevent these unwanted events. It allows
them to say, 'it's not my fault'.
I don't know how many times I have seen chat shows where, for
example, women with seven or eight children (from two, three or
four different men) complain about how badly the state looks
after them. And the audience is invariably directed to shift the
blame for this situation on to the reckless men who have
It never seems to dawn on this feminist-indoctrinated society
that such women have total responsibility for having children.
No-one can make them have them.
No wonder, therefore, that such women never need to consider
their own responsibility and are quite happy for everyone else to
pay for their children, and for the problems that, statistically
speaking, these children are likely to cause, for decades to
And matters are not helped at all when boot-licking politicians
and media folk toe the feminist line and also blame men.
They're blaming the wrong people.
If you want to fix the exhaust on your car, there's no point in
tinkering around with the engine. No matter how long you go at
it. No matter how much money you pay the mechanic. Messing about
with the engine will make no difference. Your exhaust will not
work even if you spend a million pounds on trying to do something
with the engine.
No wonder, therefore, that the numbers of single-mother families
continue to grow together with their armies of dysfunctional
Until we remove the deceptions and the deceits of feminist
doctrine from our society, and start to make women responsible
for their actions, we don't really have much hope of solving
Money that should be going to the NHS, to education and to our
old people is being spent on problems mostly caused by feminist
and politically-correct ideology.
It is such a tragic waste.
But why do we do it? Because politicians and the media have to
appease hysterical feminists and their destructive, short-sighted
ideology which denies that women should bear any responsibility
even in those areas where they have TOTAL control.
And it is TOTAL!
It is mind-boggling to see how the media panders to this
ludicrous proposition that men are the ones responsible for
pregnancies. And they do it daily.
Trisha, one of the trashiest chat programmes on TV, consistently
draws its viewers by verbally spanking working class boys and
blaming them for the ills of all of society.
For example, a recent edition of the programme (ITV 27/3/00) had
the heading, 'He Got Four Of Us Pregnant'.
Jason, apparently, has managed to impregnate four, and possibly
five, women. Two babies have already been born and two are on the
Jason protests that he's only doing what comes naturally by
screwing around, but the mostly female audience rages into him.
"He should keep his zipper closed," says one. "I've got two
bricks in my garden," says the other with venom in her voice.
It doesn't cross the minds of these feckless women that any of
Jason's 'victims' (because this is how they are portrayed) had
anything to do with it at all! They bear no responsibility at
"Why didn't you have an abortion?" asked Trisha of one of Jason's
"I've already had one termination," she replies, "and I don't
want to go through that again."
We also learn that the council once categorised this particular
woman as homeless, but that now she has been provided with a
flat, because she is going to have a child.
And this is what we do. We remove all responsibility from women
and then provide them with free apartments to aid them in the
process of single-motherhood and the production of hordes of
My hostility goes out not to them, however. The problems arise
from the way that these women have been brought up thanks to
feminist ideology and political-correctness. After all, who can
blame these women? Why should they opt for hours every day in
poorly paid jobs when they can have children and homes provided
completely free of charge?
How can anyone be surprised that the numbers keep growing when
feminists and trashy programmes keep endorsing their lifestyles?
With programmes like Trisha almost designed to absolve women from
any responsibility what hope have we got in terms of preventing
such situations occurring?
Blame the boys and give the girls a place to live.
It must be obvious even to the most vacuous of TV people that
these programmes bring about numerous social problems.
Jason will shortly have four children on this planet, with four
single women raising them on their own.
You and I will pay for all of this. Their education, their
health, their homes, and all the trouble that the children will
probably cause in the future.
'He Got Four Of Us Pregnant', says it all, doesn't it? Women are
responsible for nothing. 'He did it.'
What is infuriating is that the programme makers get fat on the
advertising proceeds of this trash. And I'm sure that Trisha
herself makes tens of thousands, if not hundreds of them. She can
sit back and afford to escape the consequences of all these
I'll bet she doesn't live on a council estate. I'll bet she can
go 'private' when it comes to health or education. She can avoid
all the social problems that her programmes create. The boys of
single mothers don't get to smash her windows or intimidate her
if she goes out in the evening.
But it isn't just trash like the Trisha programme that spreads
this ridiculous politically-correct ideology throughout the
nation. We see this happening even on programmes like BBC's
Some of you may recall a recent incident where a seventeen year
old girl had a baby by a thirteen year old boy. Of course, this
is an illegal act and would have been classed as rape had their
ages been reversed. But only boys are responsible for anything,
This girl, apparently, bore no responsibility, and so she was not
punished in any way. If the ages had been reversed, he would have
been locked up.
Here's how the political editor of the Spectator, Bruce Anderson,
started his response to the issue. "The fact that this boy got
this seventeen year old pregnant ..."
Do you see? It's embedded in the language.
This boy, this child in fact, 'got' her pregnant. She is seen as
having no responsibility at all, even though she is classed by
law as an adult whereas he is a child. But it is his fault. He is
a male and, therefore, he is responsible.
Do you remember the Woodward nanny who was convicted of murdering
a little boy in the USA? The media, the feminist lobby, the
people in her town, all drummed up hysteria and antagonism
against the US justice system for finding her guilty!
They eventually got her freed through intensive lobbying. 'She's
innocent,' they all proclaimed.
Of course she is. She's a woman.
Then there were those two nurses convicted of murdering a
colleague in Saudi Arabia. And the feminist-indoctrinated media
swung into action again, even though the evidence against one of
the nurses in particular seemed pretty overwhelming.
And off they got. Scot free.
Of course they did. They were women.
But now think about the little Jimmy Bulger case. This two-year
old was killed by two ten-year old boys.
And what did the majority of the feminist-indoctrinated media say
They said that the boys should be locked up for the full
fifteen-year term of their sentence!
They were only ten-year old boys! But they were male.
Feminism is a hateful and vindictive ideology which has no valid
concepts of equality or justice.
It allows adult women, literally, to get away with murder, while
even the youngest of boys must be seen as completely responsible
and punished to the full extent.
Women are responsible for their pregnancies. Totally responsible.
Forty years ago this was not the case. A woman had little choice.
If she became pregnant then it was right that the man shouldered
50% of the responsibility. And in other parts of the world the
same is true today. But not now, in this country, because here
women have 100% control.
Women should therefore shoulder 100% of the responsibility.
None of the above applies, of course, if the man and the woman
have agreed to a pregnancy. In this case, both are responsible.
But where a man and a woman have intercourse for the sake of sex
rather than anything else, then the woman has TOTAL control with
regard to any outcome.
If two people want to embark on a journey together in a car, then
the one who is driving is the one in control, and it is the one
who is in control of the car who is responsible for breaking the
speed limit - not the passenger. The fact that the passenger,
together with the driver, also wanted to embark upon the journey,
does not absolve the driver from having full responsibility for
controlling the speed of the car.
Women are in charge in all areas to do with becoming pregnant and
giving birth - physically, chemically, biologically,
psychologically, socially, legally and medically.
They have TOTAL control.
Also see Rant Against the CSA
( http://www.angryharry.com/esRantAgainsttheCSA.htm )
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
The Man Prayer, Red Green.